netdev - Re: [PATCH ethtool 0/2] module_common: adjust the JSON output for per-lane signals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250530182002.557c8256@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 18:20:02 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>
Cc: danieller@...dia.com, idosch@...sch.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool 0/2] module_common: adjust the JSON output for
 per-lane signals

On Fri, 30 May 2025 13:35:25 +0200 Michal Kubecek wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 07:20:31AM GMT, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > I got some feedback from users trying to integrate the SFP JSON
> > output to Meta's monitoring systems. The loss / fault signals
> > are currently a bit awkward to parse. This patch set changes
> > the format, is it still okay to merge it (as a fix?)
> > I think it's a worthwhile improvement, not sure how many people
> > depend on the current JSON format after 1 release..  
> 
> It's unfortunate that the format already got into 6.14 but thankfully
> it's been only about six weeks since so hopefully there won't be many
> (or perhaps none if we are lucky).
> 
> I wonder if it would make sense to also release 6.14.1 with the format
> change to make it more apparent for those using 6.14 that the change
> should be backported. SLE16 (and Leap 16.0) is going to be one of the
> distributions with ethtool 6.14 but there I can add the patch myself.

FWIW I'll try to get it backported to Fedora / CentOS too. 
So cutting 6.14.1 may be preferable.