[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d201228a692312c3bb658bbc3e1865a3289a0684.camel@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 10:35:29 +0000
From: <Rengarajan.S@...rochip.com>
To: <aleksei.kodanev@...l-sw.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <Raju.Lakkaraju@...rochip.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<richardcochran@...il.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: lan743x: fix potential out-of-bounds
write in lan743x_ptp_io_event_clock_get()
Hi Paolo,
On Thu, 2025-06-19 at 12:04 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you
> know the content is safe
>
> On 6/16/25 1:37 PM, Alexey Kodanev wrote:
> > Before calling lan743x_ptp_io_event_clock_get(), the 'channel'
> > value
> > is checked against the maximum value of
> > PCI11X1X_PTP_IO_MAX_CHANNELS(8).
> > This seems correct and aligns with the PTP interrupt status
> > register
> > (PTP_INT_STS) specifications.
> >
> > However, lan743x_ptp_io_event_clock_get() writes to ptp->extts[]
> > with
> > only LAN743X_PTP_N_EXTTS(4) elements, using channel as an index:
> >
> > lan743x_ptp_io_event_clock_get(..., u8 channel,...)
> > {
> > ...
> > /* Update Local timestamp */
> > extts = &ptp->extts[channel];
> > extts->ts.tv_sec = sec;
> > ...
> > }
> >
> > To avoid an out-of-bounds write and utilize all the supported GPIO
> > inputs, set LAN743X_PTP_N_EXTTS to 8.
> >
> > Detected using the static analysis tool - Svace.
> > Fixes: 60942c397af6 ("net: lan743x: Add support for PTP-IO Event
> > Input External Timestamp (extts)")
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Kodanev <aleksei.kodanev@...l-sw.com>
>
> @Rengarajan: I see you suggested this approach on V1, but it would be
> nice to have explicit ack here (or even better in this case tested-
> by)
Yes, I agree with the recent change made by Alexey to set
LAN743X_PTP_N_EXTTS to 8. I have tested this on my end using GPIO
numbers greater than 4 and did not encounter any issues. I will go
ahead and provide my acknowledgment for Alexey's patch.
Thanks,
Rengarajan S
>
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists