lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250630172052.000011bd@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 17:20:52 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
CC: <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <edward.cree@....com>,
	<davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>, Zhi Wang
	<zhiw@...dia.com>, Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v17 16/22] cxl/region: Factor out interleave ways setup

On Fri, 27 Jun 2025 16:05:20 -0700
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com> wrote:

> On 6/27/25 2:13 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2025 15:13:49 +0100
> > <alejandro.lucero-palau@....com> wrote:
> >   
> >> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> >>
> >> Region creation based on Type3 devices is triggered from user space
> >> allowing memory combination through interleaving.
> >>
> >> In preparation for kernel driven region creation, that is Type2 drivers
> >> triggering region creation backed with its advertised CXL memory, factor
> >> out a common helper from the user-sysfs region setup for interleave ways.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Zhi Wang <zhiw@...dia.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> >> Reviewed-by: Ben Cheatham <benjamin.cheatham@....com>  
> > As a heads up, this code changes a fair bit in Dan's ACQUIRE() series
> > that may well land before this.  Dave can ask for whatever resolution he
> > wants when we get to that stage!
> > 
> >   
> We probably want to rebase on top of that. Dan has an immutable branch in cxl.git for the ACQUIRE() patch. Or are you talking about the outstanding CXL changes?
> 
The CXL specific ones from that series.

J
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ