lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aGLYoSIEWtmWieLM@mini-arch>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 11:34:09 -0700
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>
To: Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/12] selftests/bpf: Allow for iteration
 over multiple states

On 06/30, Jordan Rife wrote:
> Add parentheses around loopback address check to fix up logic and make
> the socket state filter configurable for the TCP socket iterators.
> Iterators can skip the socket state check by setting ss to 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jordan Rife <jordan@...fe.io>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c        |  2 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/sock_iter_batch.c   | 11 ++++++-----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
> index 0d0f1b4debff..afe0f55ead75 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sock_iter_batch.c
> @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ static void do_resume_test(struct test_case *tc)
>  	skel->rodata->ports[0] = 0;
>  	skel->rodata->ports[1] = 0;
>  	skel->rodata->sf = tc->family;
> +	skel->rodata->ss = 0;
>  
>  	err = sock_iter_batch__load(skel);
>  	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "sock_iter_batch__load"))
> @@ -498,6 +499,7 @@ static void do_test(int sock_type, bool onebyone)
>  		skel->rodata->ports[i] = ntohs(local_port);
>  	}
>  	skel->rodata->sf = AF_INET6;

[..]

> +	skel->rodata->ss = TCP_LISTEN;

nit: let's maybe add `if (sock_type == SOCK_STREAM)` here? I see that you're
adding ss check only to the tcp prog, but let's also clearly state
the intent here..

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ