[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9565e540-3dc5-4831-b9bb-7453e5979a21@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2025 10:21:52 +0800
From: Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@...ux.dev>
To: EricChan <chenchuangyu@...omi.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
davem@...emloft.net, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>
Cc: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
Yinggang Gu <guyinggang@...ngson.cn>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, xiaojianfeng
<xiaojianfeng1@...omi.com>, xiongliang <xiongliang@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: stmmac: Fix interrupt handling for
level-triggered mode in DWC_XGMAC2
在 7/3/25 10:04 AM, EricChan 写道:
> According to the Synopsys Controller IP XGMAC-10G Ethernet MAC Databook
> v3.30a (section 2.7.2), when the INTM bit in the DMA_Mode register is set
> to 2, the sbd_perch_tx_intr_o[] and sbd_perch_rx_intr_o[] signals operate
> in level-triggered mode. However, in this configuration, the DMA does not
> assert the XGMAC_NIS status bit for Rx or Tx interrupt events.
>
> This creates a functional regression where the condition
> if (likely(intr_status & XGMAC_NIS)) in dwxgmac2_dma_interrupt() will
> never evaluate to true, preventing proper interrupt handling for
> level-triggered mode. The hardware specification explicitly states that
> "The DMA does not assert the NIS status bit for the Rx or Tx interrupt
> events" (Synopsys DWC_XGMAC2 Databook v3.30a, sec. 2.7.2).
>
> The fix ensures correct handling of both edge and level-triggered
> interrupts while maintaining backward compatibility with existing
> configurations. It has been tested on the hardware device (not publicly
> available), and it can properly trigger the RX and TX interrupt handling
> in both the INTM=0 and INTM=2 configurations.
Is there anyone willing to help test this patch on a publicly
available DWC_XGMAC2 hardware device (if such a public device exists)?
Thanks,
Yanteng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists