netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CADVnQy=nXuhs514XXm18zhPSFc_z4XjO+b-+rm5oA9egEkk=RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 14:24:25 -0400
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
To: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, 
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com> wrote:
>
> As RACK-TLP was published as a standards-track RFC8985,
> so the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack need to be updated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>

Looks good to me.

BTW, normally I think a second version of a patch like this would be
marked as v2 rather than v1. (That is, the first post of a patch is
implicitly v1.) But AFAIK there's no need to resend. :-)

Thanks!

neal