lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMaK5_hQvpOYMfs9ofAz=X1J8oOTsu4H36mQ7xiwZjh=g31A9g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 07:24:52 +0800
From: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com>
To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, 
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack

Thanks neal, have a nice weekend!

Regards
Guo Xin.

On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:24 AM Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > As RACK-TLP was published as a standards-track RFC8985,
> > so the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack need to be updated.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> BTW, normally I think a second version of a patch like this would be
> marked as v2 rather than v1. (That is, the first post of a patch is
> implicitly v1.) But AFAIK there's no need to resend. :-)
>
> Thanks!
>
> neal

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ