lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAMaK5_hQvpOYMfs9ofAz=X1J8oOTsu4H36mQ7xiwZjh=g31A9g@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2025 07:24:52 +0800 From: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com> To: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com> Cc: edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1] tcp: update the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack Thanks neal, have a nice weekend! Regards Guo Xin. On Sun, Jul 6, 2025 at 2:24 AM Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 5, 2025 at 12:37 PM Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com> wrote: > > > > As RACK-TLP was published as a standards-track RFC8985, > > so the outdated ref draft-ietf-tcpm-rack need to be updated. > > > > Signed-off-by: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com> > > Reviewed-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com> > > Looks good to me. > > BTW, normally I think a second version of a patch like this would be > marked as v2 rather than v1. (That is, the first post of a patch is > implicitly v1.) But AFAIK there's no need to resend. :-) > > Thanks! > > neal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists