[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06b5938a-0238-4da0-8b8b-dc2df95210f1@jacekk.info>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 13:13:57 +0200
From: Jacek Kowalski <jacek@...ekk.info>
To: "Loktionov, Aleksandr" <aleksandr.loktionov@...el.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
"Kitszel, Przemyslaw" <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: "intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 5/5] ixgbe: drop unnecessary
constant casts to u16
> So, the change looks scary for the first glance, but GCC actually
> handles it the same way.
Basically if there are differences, it would be a compiler bug
due to violation of C language specification.
--
Best regards,
Jacek Kowalski
Powered by blists - more mailing lists