[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250708190635.GW452973@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 20:06:35 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jacek Kowalski <jacek@...ekk.info>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/5] e1000: drop unnecessary constant casts
to u16
On Tue, Jul 08, 2025 at 10:16:52AM +0200, Jacek Kowalski wrote:
> Remove unnecessary casts of constant values to u16.
> Let the C type system do it's job.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacek Kowalski <Jacek@...ekk.info>
> Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 2 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> index d06d29c6c037..d152026a027b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
> @@ -806,7 +806,7 @@ static int e1000_eeprom_test(struct e1000_adapter *adapter, u64 *data)
> }
>
> /* If Checksum is not Correct return error else test passed */
> - if ((checksum != (u16)EEPROM_SUM) && !(*data))
> + if ((checksum != EEPROM_SUM) && !(*data))
> *data = 2;
nit: If there is a v3 for some other reason, then I think
you could also drop the inner parentheses here.
>
> return *data;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> index f9328f2e669f..0e5de52b1067 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_hw.c
> @@ -3970,7 +3970,7 @@ s32 e1000_validate_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> return E1000_SUCCESS;
>
> #endif
> - if (checksum == (u16)EEPROM_SUM)
> + if (checksum == EEPROM_SUM)
> return E1000_SUCCESS;
> else {
> e_dbg("EEPROM Checksum Invalid\n");
> @@ -3997,7 +3997,7 @@ s32 e1000_update_eeprom_checksum(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> }
> checksum += eeprom_data;
> }
> - checksum = (u16)EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
> + checksum = EEPROM_SUM - checksum;
> if (e1000_write_eeprom(hw, EEPROM_CHECKSUM_REG, 1, &checksum) < 0) {
> e_dbg("EEPROM Write Error\n");
> return -E1000_ERR_EEPROM;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> index d8595e84326d..09acba2ed483 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c
> @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ static void e1000_update_mng_vlan(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
> } else {
> adapter->mng_vlan_id = E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE;
> }
> - if ((old_vid != (u16)E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE) &&
> + if ((old_vid != E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE) &&
Ditto.
But more importantly, both Clang 20.1.7 W=1 builds (or at any rate, builds
with -Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare), and Smatch complain
that the comparison above is now always true because E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE is
-1, while old_vid is unsigned.
Perhaps E1000_MNG_VLAN_NONE should be updated to be UINT16_MAX?
> (vid != old_vid) &&
> !test_bit(old_vid, adapter->active_vlans))
> e1000_vlan_rx_kill_vid(netdev, htons(ETH_P_8021Q),
> --
> 2.47.2
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists