[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250709131800.580fde62@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 13:18:00 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Nimrod Oren <noren@...dia.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Willem de Bruijn
<willemb@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Carolina
Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: drv-net: rss_ctx: Add short delay
between per-context traffic checks
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 20:10:14 +0300 Nimrod Oren wrote:
> On 02/07/2025 3:23, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 14:18:12 +0300 Nimrod Oren wrote:
> >> A few packets may still be sent and received during the termination of
> >> the iperf processes. These late packets cause failures when they arrive
> >> on queues expected to be empty.
> >>
> >> Add a one second delay between repeated _send_traffic_check() calls in
> >> rss_ctx tests to ensure such packets are processed before the next
> >> traffic checks are performed.
> >
> > Sprinklings sleeps should be last resort. Is there a way to wait for
> > iperf to shut down cleanly, or wait for the socket to be closed fully?
> > Like wait_port_listen() ?
>
> The socket may end up in TIME_WAIT state, so waiting for it to be fully
> closed can take ~2 mins.
TIME_WAIT is as good as CLOSED for our purposes. Once we got a FIN
the chances of more traffic should be minuscule.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists