[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<TY4PR01MB14432738A4EB6D4474DB85A7A9854A@TY4PR01MB14432.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 13:07:25 +0800
From: Shengyu Qu <wiagn233@...look.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Chukun Pan
<amadeus@....edu.cn>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: wiagn233@...look.com, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: net: rfkill-gpio: document
reset-gpios
Hi Johannes,
Since this patch is already reviewed, maybe you could just merge the v3
if nobody replies?
Best regards,
Shengyu
在 2025/7/11 15:14, Johannes Berg 写道:
> On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 12:37 +0800, Shengyu Qu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> What is blocking this patch to get merged? I'm seeing more 5G modules
>> need this to work correctly, for example, FM350.
>>
>
> I guess I have no idea, fell through the cracks and so far nobody cared
> enough?
>
> DT folks, what tree should this kind of patch go through? I guess I can
> take it through wireless-next with other rfkill changes? Or should it go
> through some DT tree?
>
> johannes
>
Download attachment "OpenPGP_0xE3520CC91929C8E7.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (6869 bytes)
Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists