netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: net: rfkill-gpio: document reset-gpios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <afef6851-5e2f-41f4-b8c0-bf9bd77f7eda@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 07:43:36 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
 Shengyu Qu <wiagn233@...look.com>, Chukun Pan <amadeus@....edu.cn>,
 Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] dt-bindings: net: rfkill-gpio: document
 reset-gpios

On 11/07/2025 09:14, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 12:37 +0800, Shengyu Qu wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> What is blocking this patch to get merged? I'm seeing more 5G modules 
>> need this to work correctly, for example, FM350.
>>
> 
> I guess I have no idea, fell through the cracks and so far nobody cared
> enough?
> 
> DT folks, what tree should this kind of patch go through? I guess I can
> take it through wireless-next with other rfkill changes? Or should it go
> through some DT tree?


Preferably: net-next, wireless-next.

If you want it via DT, someone needs to explicitly ping Rob on IRC.

Best regards,
Krzysztof