lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250716164312.40a18d2f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 16:43:12 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
 bjorn@...nel.org, magnus.karlsson@...el.com, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
 jonathan.lemon@...il.com, sdf@...ichev.me, ast@...nel.org,
 daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
 joe@...a.to, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] xsk: skip validating skb list in xmit path

On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 07:37:42 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 5:56 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2025 20:27:25 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:  
> > > This patch only does one thing that removes validate_xmit_skb_list()
> > > for xsk.  
> >
> > Please no, I understand that it's fun to optimize the fallback paths
> > but it increases the complexity of the stack.  
> 
> Are you suggesting to remove this description? And I see you marked it
> as 'rejected', so it seems that I should use the V1 patch which
> doesn't increase the complexity.

No, I'm questioning optimizing the copy mode AF_XDP in the first place.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ