[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<175276020851.1941871.13592848433216998317.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2025 13:50:08 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-ppp@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
clrkwllms@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
gnault@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/1] ppp: Replace per-CPU recursion counter
with
lock-owner field
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 17:08:05 +0200 you wrote:
> This is another approach to avoid relying on local_bh_disable() for
> locking of per-CPU in ppp.
>
> I redid it with the per-CPU lock and local_lock_nested_bh() as discussed
> in v1. The xmit_recursion counter has been removed since it served the
> same purpose as the owner field. Both were updated and checked.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v3,1/1] ppp: Replace per-CPU recursion counter with lock-owner field
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/d4f6460a4bc5
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists