lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250722141004103ZDPniL4wEAkAUVVhyyQMW@zte.com.cn>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 14:10:04 +0800 (CST)
From: <fan.yu9@....com.cn>
To: <kuniyu@...gle.com>
Cc: <kuba@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        <horms@...nel.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <yang.yang29@....com.cn>, <xu.xin16@....com.cn>,
        <tu.qiang35@....com.cn>, <jiang.kun2@....com.cn>,
        <qiu.yutan@....com.cn>, <wang.yaxin@....com.cn>,
        <he.peilin@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 RESEND] tcp: trace retransmit failures in tcp_retransmit_skb

> > Thanks for checking! I just wanted to ensure the v7 patch wasn’t missed — it’s identical to the original.
> 
> You can check the patch status in patchwork, and actually this v7
> marked the previous v7 as Superseded, so you didn't need to resend :)
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?submitter=217549&state=*

Hi Kuniyuki,

Thanks for the clarification! I’ve checked the Patchwork link and now
see the v7 status("New"). My apologies for the redundant resend — I’ll
avoid this in the future.

Appreciate your patience and guidance!

Best regards,
Fan Yu
<div class="zcontentRow"><p>&gt; &gt; Thanks for checking! I just wanted to ensure the v7 patch wasn’t missed — it’s identical to the original.</p><p>&gt;&nbsp;</p><p>&gt; You can check the patch status in patchwork, and actually this v7</p><p>&gt; marked the previous v7 as Superseded, so you didn't need to resend :)</p><p>&gt;&nbsp;</p><p>&gt; https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?submitter=217549&amp;state=*</p><p><br></p><p>Hi Kuniyuki,</p><p><br></p><p>Thanks for the clarification! I’ve checked the Patchwork link and now</p><p>see the v7 status("New"). My apologies for the redundant resend — I’ll</p><p>avoid this in the future.</p><p><br></p><p>Appreciate your patience and guidance!</p><p><br></p><p>Best regards,</p><p>Fan Yu</p></div>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ