[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIJkrh9_4o6flHPE@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:51:58 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...labora.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] net: phy: realtek: Reset after clock enable
On Thu, Jul 24, 2025 at 04:39:42PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Radxa ROCK 4D boards we are seeing some issues with PHY detection and
> stability (e.g. link loss or not capable of transceiving packages) after
> new board revisions switched from a dedicated crystal to providing the
> 25 MHz PHY input clock from the SoC instead.
>
> This board is using a RTL8211F PHY, which is connected to an always-on
> regulator. Unfortunately the datasheet does not explicitly mention the
> power-up sequence regarding the clock, but it seems to assume that the
> clock is always-on (i.e. dedicated crystal).
>
> By doing an explicit reset after enabling the clock, the issue on the
> boards could no longer be observed.
>
> Note, that the RK3576 SoC used by the ROCK 4D board does not yet
> support system level PM, so the resume path has not been tested.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 7300c9b574cc ("net: phy: realtek: Add optional external PHY clock")
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Switch to PHY_RST_AFTER_CLK_EN + phy_reset_after_clk_enable(); the
> API is so far only used by the freescale/NXP MAC driver and does
> not seem to be written for usage from within the PHY driver, but
> I also don't see a good reason not to use it.
> - Also reset after re-enabling the clock in rtl821x_resume()
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250704-phy-realtek-clock-fix-v1-1-63b33d204537@kernel.org
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_main.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_main.c b/drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_main.c
> index c3dcb62574303374666b46a454cd4e10de455d24..cf128af0ec0c778262d70d6dc4524d06cbfccf1f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/realtek/realtek_main.c
> @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static int rtl821x_probe(struct phy_device *phydev)
> if (IS_ERR(priv->clk))
> return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(priv->clk),
> "failed to get phy clock\n");
> + phy_reset_after_clk_enable(phydev);
Should this depend on priv->clk existing?
>
> ret = phy_read_paged(phydev, RTL8211F_PHYCR_PAGE, RTL8211F_PHYCR1);
> if (ret < 0)
> @@ -627,8 +628,10 @@ static int rtl821x_resume(struct phy_device *phydev)
> struct rtl821x_priv *priv = phydev->priv;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!phydev->wol_enabled)
> + if (!phydev->wol_enabled) {
> clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> + phy_reset_after_clk_enable(phydev);
Should this depend on priv->clk existing?
I'm thinking about platforms such as Jetson Xavier NX, which I
believe uses a crystal, and doesn't appear to suffer from any
problems.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists