[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aIdBK8xnUErsvBKS@rli9-mobl>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2025 17:21:47 +0800
From: Philip Li <philip.li@...el.com>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>
CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Carolina Jubran <cjubran@...dia.com>,
<oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev>, <lkp@...el.com>, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [selftest] 236156d80d:
kernel-selftests.drivers/net/netdevsim.devlink.sh.rate_test.fail
On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 09:38:25AM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> hi, Jakub Kicinski,
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 08:08:18AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 20:34:58 +0800 kernel test robot wrote:
> > > kernel test robot noticed "kernel-selftests.drivers/net/netdevsim.devlink.sh.rate_test.fail" on:
> > >
> > > commit: 236156d80d5efd942fc395a078d6ec6d810c2c40 ("selftest: netdevsim: Add devlink rate tc-bw test")
> > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
> > >
> > > [test failed on linux-next/master 97987520025658f30bb787a99ffbd9bbff9ffc9d]
> >
> > This is not helpful, you have old tools in your environment.
>
> thanks a lot for information! any special tools need to be upgraded for the
> new test by this commit? we will update our environment.
hi Jakub, after further check, it is an issue of 0day environment that the iproute2 used
is out of dated which doesn't support the 'tc-bw' option.
Sorry for this false positive, we will resolve the issue asap and consider how
to do appropriate upgrade of various tools.
Thanks
>
> >
> > Ideally you'd report regressions in existing test _cases_
> > (I mean an individial [ OK ] turning into a [FAIL]).
>
> yeah, we are confused by below,
>
> from parent:
>
> # TEST: dummy reporter test [ OK ]
> # TEST: rate test [ OK ] <-----
> ok 1 selftests: drivers/net/netdevsim: devlink.sh
>
>
> but by this commit:
>
> # TEST: dummy reporter test [ OK ]
> # Unknown option "tc-bw"
> # Unknown option "tc-bw"
> # Unknown option "tc-bw"
> # Unknown option "tc-bw"
> # Unknown option "tc-bw"
> # TEST: rate test [FAIL] <-----
> # Unexpected tc-bw value for tc6: 0 != 60
> not ok 1 selftests: drivers/net/netdevsim: devlink.sh # exit=1
>
>
>
> >
> > The bash tests depend on too many CLI tools to be expected
> > to pass. Having to detect the tool versions is an unnecessary
> > burden on the test author. Tools usually get updated within
> > 3 months and then all these checks become dead code for the
> > rest of time...
> >
>
> got it, we will try to study how keep our env up-to-date.
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists