[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3dba1e87-5087-4641-ac9b-db800cbbf994@linux.dev>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 16:16:57 -0700
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net,
tj@...nel.org, memxor@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/3] selftests/bpf: Add multi_st_ops that
supports multiple instances
On 8/6/25 9:25 AM, Amery Hung wrote:
> +int bpf_kfunc_multi_st_ops_test_1(struct st_ops_args *args, u32 id)
> +{
> + struct bpf_testmod_multi_st_ops *st_ops;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&multi_st_ops_lock, flags);
> + st_ops = multi_st_ops_find_nolock(id);
> + if (st_ops)
> + ret = st_ops->test_1(args);
test_1 cannot be NULL,
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&multi_st_ops_lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int multi_st_ops_reg(void *kdata, struct bpf_link *link)
> +{
> + struct bpf_testmod_multi_st_ops *st_ops =
> + (struct bpf_testmod_multi_st_ops *)kdata;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int err = 0;
> + u32 id;
> +
so I added a "if (!st_ops->test_1)" test.
> + id = bpf_struct_ops_id(kdata);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&multi_st_ops_lock, flags);
> + if (multi_st_ops_find_nolock(id)) {
> + pr_err("multi_st_ops(id:%d) has already been registered\n", id);
> + err = -EEXIST;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> +
> + st_ops->id = id;
> + hlist_add_head(&st_ops->node, &multi_st_ops_list);
> +unlock:
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&multi_st_ops_lock, flags);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
> index c9fab51f16e2..b8001ba7c368 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_kmods/bpf_testmod.h
> @@ -116,4 +116,12 @@ struct bpf_testmod_st_ops {
> struct module *owner;
> };
>
> +#define BPF_TESTMOD_NAME_SZ 16
Not sure why it is here. I don't see it is used, so removed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists