lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250807094808.GA82267@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2025 10:48:08 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Dennis Chen <dchen27@...u.edu>, Dennis Chen <dechen@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, petrm@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] netdevsim: Add support for ethtool stats
 and add

On Wed, Aug 06, 2025 at 07:48:00AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2025 10:05:27 -0400 Dennis Chen wrote:
> > > The tests for netdevsim must test something meaningful in the kernel.
> > > This submission really looks like you need it to test some user space
> > > code.
> > 
> > This test would help verify that ethtool_ops correctly propagates stats to
> > userspace, would that not be significant enough for a test?
> > 
> > My thought was that it would be similar to the patches for ethtool
> > --show-phys here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250710062248.378459-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com/
> 
> What are you trying to test. Like, what _actually_ made you and Kamal
> write these patches? I can't think of many bugs in the area. And you
> clearly have zero familiarity with our recommendation of what stats
> to report and how :/ so if anything your code is hurting more than
> helping.

Thanks Jakub,

I'll work with the team to find a better approach.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ