[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250812152322.19336-1-guoxin0309@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 23:23:22 +0800
From: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com>
To: ncardwell@...gle.com,
edumazet@...gle.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] Check in_sack firstly in tcp_match_skb_to_sack()
This is because only when in_sack is equal to false
the pkt_len can be greater than or equal to skb->len,
so checking the in_sack firstly will make the logic
more clear.
Signed-off-by: Xin Guo <guoxin0309@...il.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
index 71b76e98371a..293fb2cc8969 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -1375,7 +1375,7 @@ static int tcp_match_skb_to_sack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
pkt_len = new_len;
}
- if (pkt_len >= skb->len && !in_sack)
+ if (!in_sack && pkt_len >= skb->len)
return 0;
err = tcp_fragment(sk, TCP_FRAG_IN_RTX_QUEUE, skb,
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists