netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next 2/2] devlink/port: Simplify return checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <CY8PR12MB7195DD5A5016A7F401467132DC2BA@CY8PR12MB7195.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:21:32 +0000
From: Parav Pandit <parav@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "horms@...nel.org"
	<horms@...nel.org>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 2/2] devlink/port: Simplify return checks



> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: 12 August 2025 08:18 PM
> 
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 13:45:09 +0000 Parav Pandit wrote:
> > The general guidance was to not do multiple different types of changes in
> single patch.
> > No strong preference to me.
> 
> It would probably make more sense if the order of the patches was inverted.

Right. Will send v2 with reverse order and addressing other comment.
Thanks.