[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497996B7269F1229+20250815024302.GC1137415@nic-Precision-5820-Tower>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2025 10:43:02 +0800
From: Yibo Dong <dong100@...se.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
corbet@....net, gur.stavi@...wei.com, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
mpe@...erman.id.au, danishanwar@...com, lee@...ger.us,
gongfan1@...wei.com, lorenzo@...nel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com, lukas.bulwahn@...hat.com,
alexanderduyck@...com, richardcochran@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] net: rnpgbe: Add basic mbx ops support
On Fri, Aug 15, 2025 at 04:13:52AM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > +const struct mucse_mbx_operations mucse_mbx_ops_generic = {
> > + .init_params = mucse_init_mbx_params_pf,
> > + .read = mucse_read_mbx_pf,
> > + .write = mucse_write_mbx_pf,
> > + .read_posted = mucse_read_posted_mbx,
> > + .write_posted = mucse_write_posted_mbx,
> > + .check_for_msg = mucse_check_for_msg_pf,
> > + .check_for_ack = mucse_check_for_ack_pf,
> > + .configure = mucse_mbx_configure_pf,
> > +};
>
> As far as i can see, this is the only instance of
> mucse_mbx_operations. Will there be other instances of this structure?
>
> Andrew
>
Yes, It is the only instance. Not other instances at all.
Is there any improvement?
Thanks for your feedback.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists