lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACKFLikfBJGf7PzayopO5r-gNfM5BMFLvv2omxikKEdRq3fHug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 09:56:38 -0700
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Cc: Shruti Parab <shruti.parab@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, 
	kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, 
	pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com, andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com, 
	davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] bnxt_en: Refactor bnxt_get_regs()

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 1:56 AM Przemek Kitszel
<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/18/25 02:49, Michael Chan wrote:
> > From: Shruti Parab <shruti.parab@...adcom.com>
> >
> > Separate the code that sends the FW message to retrieve pcie stats into
> > a new helper function.  This will be useful when adding the support for
> > the larger struct pcie_ctx_hw_stats_v2.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shruti Parab <shruti.parab@...adcom.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
> > ---
> >   .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c | 43 +++++++++++--------
> >   1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
> > index 68a4ee9f69b1..2eb7c09a116f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
> > @@ -2074,6 +2074,25 @@ static int bnxt_get_regs_len(struct net_device *dev)
> >       return reg_len;
> >   }
> >
> > +static void *
> > +__bnxt_hwrm_pcie_qstats(struct bnxt *bp, struct hwrm_pcie_qstats_input *req)
> > +{
> > +     struct pcie_ctx_hw_stats_v2 *hw_pcie_stats;
> > +     dma_addr_t hw_pcie_stats_addr;
> > +     int rc;
> > +
> > +     hw_pcie_stats = hwrm_req_dma_slice(bp, req, sizeof(*hw_pcie_stats),
> > +                                        &hw_pcie_stats_addr);
> > +     if (!hw_pcie_stats)
>
> looks like hwrm_req_drop() is missing
> If that was intentionall, I would expect commit message to explain the
> imbalance of old and new code for "refactor".

The caller handles hwrm_req_drop() for the success and error case.  We
will modify the Changelog to make this clear.  Thanks for the review.

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4196 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ