[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b711a6e-23ff-4859-b572-fdcab8c4a824@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 10:55:58 +0200
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, Shruti Parab
<shruti.parab@...adcom.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com>,
<andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] bnxt_en: Refactor bnxt_get_regs()
On 8/18/25 02:49, Michael Chan wrote:
> From: Shruti Parab <shruti.parab@...adcom.com>
>
> Separate the code that sends the FW message to retrieve pcie stats into
> a new helper function. This will be useful when adding the support for
> the larger struct pcie_ctx_hw_stats_v2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shruti Parab <shruti.parab@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c | 43 +++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
> index 68a4ee9f69b1..2eb7c09a116f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
> @@ -2074,6 +2074,25 @@ static int bnxt_get_regs_len(struct net_device *dev)
> return reg_len;
> }
>
> +static void *
> +__bnxt_hwrm_pcie_qstats(struct bnxt *bp, struct hwrm_pcie_qstats_input *req)
> +{
> + struct pcie_ctx_hw_stats_v2 *hw_pcie_stats;
> + dma_addr_t hw_pcie_stats_addr;
> + int rc;
> +
> + hw_pcie_stats = hwrm_req_dma_slice(bp, req, sizeof(*hw_pcie_stats),
> + &hw_pcie_stats_addr);
> + if (!hw_pcie_stats)
looks like hwrm_req_drop() is missing
If that was intentionall, I would expect commit message to explain the
imbalance of old and new code for "refactor".
> + return NULL;
> +
> + req->pcie_stat_size = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(*hw_pcie_stats));
> + req->pcie_stat_host_addr = cpu_to_le64(hw_pcie_stats_addr);
> + rc = hwrm_req_send(bp, req);
> +
> + return rc ? NULL : hw_pcie_stats;
> +}
> +
> #define BNXT_PCIE_32B_ENTRY(start, end) \
> { offsetof(struct pcie_ctx_hw_stats, start), \
> offsetof(struct pcie_ctx_hw_stats, end) }
> @@ -2088,11 +2107,9 @@ static const struct {
> static void bnxt_get_regs(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_regs *regs,
> void *_p)
> {
> - struct pcie_ctx_hw_stats *hw_pcie_stats;
> struct hwrm_pcie_qstats_input *req;
> struct bnxt *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
> - dma_addr_t hw_pcie_stats_addr;
> - int rc;
> + u8 *src;
>
> regs->version = 0;
> if (!(bp->fw_dbg_cap & DBG_QCAPS_RESP_FLAGS_REG_ACCESS_RESTRICTED))
> @@ -2104,24 +2121,14 @@ static void bnxt_get_regs(struct net_device *dev, struct ethtool_regs *regs,
> if (hwrm_req_init(bp, req, HWRM_PCIE_QSTATS))
> return;
>
> - hw_pcie_stats = hwrm_req_dma_slice(bp, req, sizeof(*hw_pcie_stats),
> - &hw_pcie_stats_addr);
> - if (!hw_pcie_stats) {
> - hwrm_req_drop(bp, req);
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - regs->version = 1;
> - hwrm_req_hold(bp, req); /* hold on to slice */
> - req->pcie_stat_size = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(*hw_pcie_stats));
> - req->pcie_stat_host_addr = cpu_to_le64(hw_pcie_stats_addr);
> - rc = hwrm_req_send(bp, req);
> - if (!rc) {
> + hwrm_req_hold(bp, req);
> + src = __bnxt_hwrm_pcie_qstats(bp, req);
> + if (src) {
> u8 *dst = (u8 *)(_p + BNXT_PXP_REG_LEN);
> - u8 *src = (u8 *)hw_pcie_stats;
> int i, j;
>
> - for (i = 0, j = 0; i < sizeof(*hw_pcie_stats); ) {
> + regs->version = 1;
> + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < sizeof(struct pcie_ctx_hw_stats); ) {
> if (i >= bnxt_pcie_32b_entries[j].start &&
> i <= bnxt_pcie_32b_entries[j].end) {
> u32 *dst32 = (u32 *)(dst + i);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists