[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aKPYe8t7kR_u7DZ7@fedora>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 01:50:51 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests: rtnetlink: fix addrlft test flakiness on
power-saving systems
On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 06:30:12PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2025 04:34:59 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > Jakub reported that the rtnetlink test for the preferred lifetime of an
> > address has become quite flaky. The issue started appearing around the 6.16
> > merge window in May, and the test fails with:
> >
> > FAIL: preferred_lft addresses remaining
> >
> > The flakiness might be related to power-saving behavior, as address
> > expiration is handled by a "power-efficient" workqueue.
> >
> > To address this, use slowwait to check more frequently whether the address
> > still exists. This reduces the likelihood of the system entering a low-power
> > state during the test, improving reliability.
>
> It flaked again, after long time of being fine..
>
> https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/259361/15-rtnetlink-sh/stdout
Hmm, I think we need to know what's the current preferred_lft and valid_lft
on failed test. Would you please add a debug line so we can get the info
after failed?
slowwait 5 check_addr_not_exist "$devdummy" "10.23.11."
if [ $? -eq 1 ]; then
+ ip addr show dev "$devdummy"
check_err 1
end_test "FAIL: preferred_lft addresses remaining"
return
Thanks
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists