[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250819020710.6681-1-hept.hept.hept@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 10:07:10 +0800
From: Pengtao He <hept.hept.hept@...il.com>
To: willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com
Cc: aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
almasrymina@...gle.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
ebiggers@...gle.com,
edumazet@...gle.com,
hept.hept.hept@...il.com,
horms@...nel.org,
kerneljasonxing@...il.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mhal@...x.co,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
willemb@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4] net/core: fix wrong return value in __splice_segment
> Pengtao He wrote:
> > If *len is equal to 0 at the beginning of __splice_segment
> > it returns true directly. But when decreasing *len from
> > a positive number to 0 in __splice_segment, it returns false.
> > The caller needs to call __splice_segment again.
> >
> > Recheck *len if it changes, return true in time.
> > Reduce unnecessary calls to __splice_segment.
>
> Fix is a strong term. The existing behavior is correct, it just takes
> an extra pass through the loop in caller __skb_splice_bits. As also
> indicated by this patch targeting net-next.
>
> I would suggest something like "net: avoid one loop iteration in __skb_splice_bits"
Thanks for the detailed and good suggestion. I will correct it.
>
>
> > Signed-off-by: Pengtao He <hept.hept.hept@...il.com>
> > ---
> > v4:
> > Correct the commit message.
> > v3:
> > Reduce once condition evaluation.
> > v2:
> > Correct the commit message and target tree.
> > v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250723063119.24059-1-hept.hept.hept@gmail.com/
> > ---
> > net/core/skbuff.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > index ee0274417948..23b776cd9879 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> > @@ -3112,7 +3112,9 @@ static bool __splice_segment(struct page *page, unsigned int poff,
> > poff += flen;
> > plen -= flen;
> > *len -= flen;
> > - } while (*len && plen);
> > + if (!*len)
> > + return true;
> > + } while (plen);
> >
> > return false;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.49.0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists