[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLBIUPQP_R972YXs@krikkit>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 14:15:12 +0200
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 08/13] macsec: add NLA_POLICY_MAX for
MACSEC_OFFLOAD_ATTR_TYPE and IFLA_MACSEC_OFFLOAD
2025-08-27, 18:51:49 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:16:26 +0200 Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
> > This is equivalent to the existing checks allowing either
> > MACSEC_OFFLOAD_OFF or calling macsec_check_offload.
>
> AFAICT "equivalent" is a bit misleading as we didn't have validation.
> But seems low risk.
We didn't have validation, but macsec_check_offload would return false
if offload was not one of {MACSEC_OFFLOAD_PHY,MACSEC_OFFLOAD_MAC}.
So I don't think this is adding any constraints compared to what we
already did.
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists