[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aK_VQurV1-eQ0UJ9@fedora>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2025 04:04:18 +0000
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Jakub Acs <acsjakub@...zon.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Fernando Fernandez Mancera <ffmancera@...eup.net>,
Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] hsr: use netdev_master_upper_dev_link() when linking
lower ports
On Wed, Aug 27, 2025 at 06:06:03PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 01:33:52 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > Unlike VLAN devices, HSR changes the lower device’s rx_handler, which
> > prevents the lower device from being attached to another master.
> > Switch to using netdev_master_upper_dev_link() when setting up the lower
> > device.
> >
> > This also improves user experience, since ip link will now display the
> ^^^^
>
> Why this "also" here? You haven't mentioned any benefit of this change
> up to this point. AFAIK having the master link is the only one?
Apart from the "fix"(I thought), we can "also" benefit of the ip link output.
>
> > HSR device as the master for its ports.
> >
> > Fixes: e0a4b99773d3 ("hsr: use upper/lower device infrastructure")
>
> The current behavior is 5 years old, AFAICT. We need a reason to treat
> this as a fix, right now this looks like net-next material..
If you think this is not a fix. Sure I can remove the "also" word and post to
net-next :)
Thanks
Hangbin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists