netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: maxlinear: Add support for MxL LGM SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d296ac31-35d1-4436-8ddd-14ceef02264c@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 22:29:21 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jack Ping CHNG <jchng@...linear.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, yzhu@...linear.com,
	sureshnagaraj@...linear.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] net: maxlinear: Add support for MxL LGM
 SoC

> +#define MXL_NUM_PORT		4

> +	if (of_property_read_u32(np, "reg", &priv->port_id) < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get port id\n");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

So the value of the port_id/reg does not matter? In device tree i
could use 42, 1024, 65535, 24?

	Andrew