[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aLIi3ToMmFXNO0V5@x130>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:59:57 -0700
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>, mbloch@...dia.com,
Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next V2 3/7] net/mlx5: E-Switch, Add support for
adjacent functions vports discovery
On 28 Aug 12:34, Simon Horman wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 09:45:12PM -0700, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> From: Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@...dia.com>
>>
>> Adding driver support to query adjacent functions vports, AKA
>> delegated vports.
>>
>> Adjacent functions can delegate their sriov vfs to other sibling PF in
>> the system, to be managed by the eswitch capable sibling PF.
>> E.g, ECPF to Host PF, multi host PF between each other, etc.
>>
>> Only supported in switchdev mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adithya Jayachandran <ajayachandra@...dia.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
>
>...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
>
>...
>
>> +static int
>> +mlx5_eswitch_load_adj_vf_vports(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
>> + enum mlx5_eswitch_vport_event enabled_events)
>> +{
>> + struct mlx5_vport *vport;
>> + unsigned long i;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + mlx5_esw_for_each_vf_vport(esw, i, vport, U16_MAX) {
>> + if (!vport->adjacent)
>> + continue;
>> + err = mlx5_eswitch_load_pf_vf_vport(esw, vport->vport,
>> + enabled_events);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto unload_adj_vf_vport;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +unload_adj_vf_vport:
>> + mlx5_eswitch_unload_adj_vf_vports(esw);
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> int mlx5_eswitch_load_vf_vports(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw, u16 num_vfs,
>> enum mlx5_eswitch_vport_event enabled_events)
>> {
>> @@ -1345,7 +1382,15 @@ mlx5_eswitch_enable_pf_vf_vports(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
>> enabled_events);
>> if (ret)
>> goto vf_err;
>> +
>> + /* Enable adjacent VF vports */
>> + ret = mlx5_eswitch_load_adj_vf_vports(esw, enabled_events);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto unload_adj_vf_vports;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> +unload_adj_vf_vports:
>> + mlx5_eswitch_unload_adj_vf_vports(esw);
>>
>
>Hi Adithya and Saeed,
>
>mlx5_eswitch_load_adj_vf_vports() already unwinds on error,
>calling mlx5_eswitch_unload_adj_vf_vports().
>
>While resources allocated by the preceding call to
>mlx5_eswitch_load_vf_vports() (just before this hunk) seem to be leaked.
>
>So I wonder if the above two lines should be:
>
>unload_vf_vports:
> mlx5_eswitch_unload_vf_vports(esw, num_vfs);
>
Yep, looks incorrect, let me double check and submit v3.
>> vf_err:
>> if (mlx5_core_ec_sriov_enabled(esw->dev))
>
>...
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> index cfd6b1b8c6f4..9f8bb397eae5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.h
>> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@ struct mlx5_vport {
>> u32 metadata;
>> int vhca_id;
>>
>> + bool adjacent; /* delegated vhca from adjacent function */
>> struct mlx5_vport_info info;
>>
>> /* Protected with the E-Switch qos domain lock. The Vport QoS can
>> @@ -384,6 +385,7 @@ struct mlx5_eswitch {
>>
>> struct mlx5_esw_bridge_offloads *br_offloads;
>> struct mlx5_esw_offload offloads;
>> + u32 last_vport_idx; /* ++ every time a vport is created */
>
>The comment above documents one operation that can occur
>on this field. But the code also performs others: decrement and set.
>
>So perhaps this is more appropriate?
>
> u32 last_vport_idx; /* Number of vports created */
>
>Or dropping the comment entirely: it seems obvious enough.
>
Agreed, will drop.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists