[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0ae16ef0-45d7-4775-a825-87a352fc03e0@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 20:01:42 +0200
From: Stefan Wahren <wahrenst@....net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@...electronics.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: fec: Fix possible NPD in
fec_enet_phy_reset_after_clk_enable()
Hi Jakub,
[drop bouncing address]
Am 04.09.25 um 15:58 schrieb Jakub Kicinski:
> On Thu, 4 Sep 2025 11:13:34 +0200 Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> phy_dev = of_phy_find_device(fep->phy_node);
>> phy_reset_after_clk_enable(phy_dev);
>> - put_device(&phy_dev->mdio.dev);
>> + if (phy_dev)
>> + put_device(&phy_dev->mdio.dev);
> Looks correct, but isn't it better to also wrap
> phy_reset_after_clk_enable() with the if()?
since phy_reset_after_clk_enable() have an internal check, i thought it
won't be necessary. So this variant has fewer lines.
Best regards
> Up to you..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists