[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b83a59f9-16ae-4835-b185-d5209d70a0f6@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 10:53:26 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] dt-bindings: net: qcom: document the ethqos device
for SCMI-based systems
On 9/10/25 4:42 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 4:36 PM Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 03:43:38PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 3:38 PM Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 10:07:39 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>>>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> Describe the firmware-managed variant of the QCom DesignWare MAC. As the
>>>>> properties here differ a lot from the HLOS-managed variant, lets put it
>>>>> in a separate file.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>
>>>>> ---
[...]
>>> These seem to be a false-positives triggered by modifying the
>>> high-level snps.dwmac.yaml file?
>>
>> No. You just made 3 power-domains required for everyone.
>>
>
> With a maxItems: 3?
In the common definition:
minItems: n
maxItems: 3
In your new file that includes the main one:
properties:
power-domains:
minItems: 3
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists