lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <815dcbff-ab08-4b92-acf4-6e28a230e1bf@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 18:44:07 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: phylink: warn if deprecated
 array-style fixed-link binding is used

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 06:28:03PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 9/11/2025 8:34 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 09/09/2025 21:16, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> >> The array-style fixed-link binding has been marked deprecated for more
> >> than 10 yrs, but still there's a number of users. Print a warning when
> >> usage of the deprecated binding is detected.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/phy/phylink.c | 3 +++
> >>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> >> index c7f867b36..d3cb52717 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phylink.c
> >> @@ -700,6 +700,9 @@ static int phylink_parse_fixedlink(struct phylink *pl,
> >>  			return -EINVAL;
> >>  		}
> >>  
> >> +		phylink_warn(pl, "%s uses deprecated array-style fixed-link binding!",
> >> +			     fwnode_get_name(fwnode));
> > Similar comment as for patch #1 - this seems to be going to printk, so
> > use proper % format for fwnodes (I think there is as well such).
> > 
> At least here no format for fwnodes is mentioned.
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/printk-formats.txt

I could be reading it wrong, but:

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16.6/source/lib/vsprintf.c#L2432
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.16.6/source/lib/vsprintf.c#L2522

	Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ