lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAVpQUDe3uStevAzpQ0nreUrJRGgJYY9wF1-k=JT49jL2K8oTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 10:45:22 -0700
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, 
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net 6/8] tcp: Use sk_dst_dev_rcu() in tcp_fastopen_active_disable_ofo_check().

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:35 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:24 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 10:07 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 9:53 AM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I missed this one.  I'll drop this patch and send the
> > > > series to net-next.
> > > >
> > >
> > > No problem.
> > >
> > > Main reason for us to use net-next is that adding lockdep can bring new issues,
> > > thus we have more time to polish patches before hitting more users.
> > >
> > > We also can iterate faster, not having to wait one week for net fan in.
> >
> > Thank you for explaining the reason.  That makes sense.
> >
> > Then should we keep or drop Fixes: tag ?  At least it will not land
> > on the mainline and thus stable until the next merge window.
>
> Fixes: tags are fine.
>
> I usually do not add them for all patches, because I know that
> everything will be
> backported anyway because of dependencies.

Thanks for clarification.  I'll keep them this time.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ