[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ac0ee3d-c0bf-4768-8ccc-8f853762a8db@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 13:24:54 +0530
From: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+ea28e9d85be2f327b6c6@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
"D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Dust Li <dust.li@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@...ux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang
<wenjia@...ux.ibm.com>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>, Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hans Wippel <hwippel@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net 2/8] smc: Fix use-after-free in
__pnet_find_base_ndev().
On 11/09/25 8:35 am, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> - return;
> + dev = sk_dst_dev_get(sk);
> + if (dev) {
> + smc_pnet_find_roce_by_pnetid(dev, ini);
> + dev_put(dev);
Nit: Should we use netdev_put() along with netdev_hold() in
sk_dst_dev_get()? Same query for other places where we are using dev_put().
Powered by blists - more mailing lists