[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54efefb7-690e-492e-9f2d-8457d6424861@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 17:12:19 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Marek Beh__n <kabel@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/7] net: sfp: pre-parse the module support
> +static void sfp_module_may_have_phy(struct sfp_bus *bus,
> + const struct sfp_eeprom_id *id)
> +{
_may_have_phy() sounds like a question, and you would expect a return
value as the answer. But that is not what this does.
Maybe sfp_module_set_may_have_phy()?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists