[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edc230c2-1079-4439-8bb8-ac73135c8f7e@davidwei.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2025 08:56:22 -0700
From: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
razor@...ckwall.org, pabeni@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com, sdf@...ichev.me,
john.fastabend@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org, jordan@...fe.io,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/20] net: Add peer to netdev_rx_queue
On 2025-09-22 18:22, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 23:31:35 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>> +static inline void netdev_rx_queue_peer(struct net_device *src_dev,
>> + struct netdev_rx_queue *src_rxq,
>> + struct netdev_rx_queue *dst_rxq)
>> +{
>> + dev_hold(src_dev);
>
> netdev_hold() is required for all new code
Got it, will update.
>
>> + __netdev_rx_queue_peer(src_rxq, dst_rxq);
>
> Also please avoid static inlines if you need to call a func from
> another header. It complicates header dependencies.
Didn't know this, thanks, will fix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists