lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250925092216.GA836419@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 10:22:16 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jiawenwu@...stnetic.com,
	duanqiangwen@...-swift.com, linglingzhang@...stnetic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] Wangxun: vf: Implement some ethtool apis for
 get_xxx

On Wed, Sep 24, 2025 at 04:21:40PM +0800, Mengyuan Lou wrote:
> Implement some ethtool interfaces for obtaining the status of
> Wangxun Virtual Function Ethernet.
> Just like connection status, version information, queue depth and so on.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mengyuan Lou <mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>

Hi Mengyuan Lou,

To my mind this patch, although small is doing quite a few things.

1. Adding ethtool code to libwx
2. Using 1 in two drivers
3. Adding a wx_get_fw_version_vf() call to two drivers

To be honest I would probably have split this up a bit.
Especially 3. But perhaps that is just me.

Also, I think that, as things stand, "net: wangxun: " would be a more
appropriate prefix for the title of the patch.

So if you do decide to re-spin, please consider the above.

But regardless, the code looks fine to me.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>

...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ