[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aOzrup9K8AE_dV28@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 13:08:26 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: luoxuanqiang <xuanqiang.luo@...ux.dev>
Cc: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>,
Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kuba@...nel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuniyu@...gle.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/3] rculist: Add hlist_nulls_replace_rcu()
and hlist_nulls_replace_init_rcu()
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 03:04:34PM +0800, luoxuanqiang wrote:
>
> 在 2025/10/13 14:26, Jason Xing 写道:
> > On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 1:36 PM Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:16:00AM +0800, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > > On 9/26/25 9:40 AM, xuanqiang.luo@...ux.dev wrote:
> > > > > From: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
> > > > >
> > > > > Add two functions to atomically replace RCU-protected hlist_nulls entries.
> > > [...]
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
> > > > This deserves explicit ack from RCU maintainers.
> > > >
> > > > Since we are finalizing the net-next PR, I suggest to defer this series
> > > > to the next cycle, to avoid rushing such request.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Paolo
> > > Hi maintainers,
> > >
> > > This patch was previously held off due to the merge window.
> > >
> > > Now that the merge net-next has open and no further changes are required,
> > > could we please consider merging it directly?
> > >
> > > Apologies for the slight push, but I'm hoping we can get a formal
> > > commit backported to our production branch.
> > I suppose a new version that needs to be rebased is necessary.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jason
>
> I’ve rebased the series of patches onto the latest codebase locally and
> didn’t encounter any errors.
>
> If there’s anything else I can do to help get these patches merged, just
> let me know.
Hi,
The patch-set has been marked as "Deffered" in Patchwork.
Presumably by Paolo in conjunction with his response above.
As such the patch-set needs to be (rebased and) reposted in
order for it to be considered by the maintainers again.
I think the best practice is for this to happen _after_ one
of the maintainers has sent an "ANN" email announcing that
net-next has re-opened. I don't believe that has happened yet.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists