lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d644c8af-2ffe-41c1-bc6d-3f95ddbac756@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:29:11 +0800
From: luoxuanqiang <xuanqiang.luo@...ux.dev>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>,
 Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 kuba@...nel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, davem@...emloft.net,
 kuniyu@...gle.com, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>,
 Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
 Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 1/3] rculist: Add hlist_nulls_replace_rcu()
 and hlist_nulls_replace_init_rcu()


在 2025/10/13 20:08, Simon Horman 写道:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 03:04:34PM +0800, luoxuanqiang wrote:
>> 在 2025/10/13 14:26, Jason Xing 写道:
>>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 1:36 PM Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@...ux.dev> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2025 at 11:16:00AM +0800, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>>>>> On 9/26/25 9:40 AM, xuanqiang.luo@...ux.dev wrote:
>>>>>> From: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Add two functions to atomically replace RCU-protected hlist_nulls entries.
>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Xuanqiang Luo <luoxuanqiang@...inos.cn>
>>>>> This deserves explicit ack from RCU maintainers.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since we are finalizing the net-next PR, I suggest to defer this series
>>>>> to the next cycle, to avoid rushing such request.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Paolo
>>>> Hi maintainers,
>>>>
>>>> This patch was previously held off due to the merge window.
>>>>
>>>> Now that the merge net-next has open and no further changes are required,
>>>> could we please consider merging it directly?
>>>>
>>>> Apologies for the slight push, but I'm hoping we can get a formal
>>>> commit backported to our production branch.
>>> I suppose a new version that needs to be rebased is necessary.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jason
>> I’ve rebased the series of patches onto the latest codebase locally and
>> didn’t encounter any errors.
>>
>> If there’s anything else I can do to help get these patches merged, just
>> let me know.
> Hi,
>
> The patch-set has been marked as "Deffered" in Patchwork.
> Presumably by Paolo in conjunction with his response above.
> As such the patch-set needs to be (rebased and) reposted in
> order for it to be considered by the maintainers again.
>
> I think the best practice is for this to happen _after_ one
> of the maintainers has sent an "ANN" email announcing that
> net-next has re-opened. I don't believe that has happened yet.
>
> Thanks!

Dear Simon,

Thanks for the detailed explanation. I think we now know how
to handle this kind of situation.

net‑next has been reopened, and I have rebased and resent
the patch-set.

Thanks!


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ