netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: better handle TCP_TX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251014193431.534653d5@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:34:31 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Neal Cardwell
 <ncardwell@...gle.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Kuniyuki
 Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: better handle TCP_TX_DELAY on established
 flows

On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 14:59:26 +0000 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> +		if (val < 0 || val >= (1U << (31 - 3)) ) {

Is the space between the ))) brackets intentional?
Sorry for asking late.. we can fix when applying.