lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+-N2Z1ASuUhFM8nC0AfJg=Lg4sQ8OccucuO7BEDvitUw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 22:17:35 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>, 
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: better handle TCP_TX_DELAY on established flows

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 7:34 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 14:59:26 +0000 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > +             if (val < 0 || val >= (1U << (31 - 3)) ) {
>
> Is the space between the ))) brackets intentional?
> Sorry for asking late.. we can fix when applying.

This was not intentional, sorry for this.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ