lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPjsbGYDtohQaAy7@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:38:36 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	alok.a.tiwarilinux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] idpf: correct queue index in Rx allocation
 error messages

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:40:54AM -0700, Alok Tiwari wrote:
> The error messages in idpf_rx_desc_alloc_all() used the group index i
> when reporting memory allocation failures for individual Rx and Rx buffer
> queues. The correct index to report is j, which represents the specific
> queue within the group.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>

...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ