lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3aa7dc80-ef6e-43a8-a374-a4528ef34657@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 20:35:02 +0530
From: ALOK TIWARI <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com,
        andrew+netdev@...n.ch, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        alok.a.tiwarilinux@...il.com
Subject: Re: [External] : Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] idpf: fix typos and correct
 doc comments in idpf driver



On 10/22/2025 8:10 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:40:55AM -0700, Alok Tiwari wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_singleq_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_singleq_txrx.c
>> index 61e613066140..ffc24a825129 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_singleq_txrx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_singleq_txrx.c
>> @@ -1029,7 +1029,7 @@ static void idpf_xdp_run_pass(struct libeth_xdp_buff *xdp,
>>    * @rx_q: rx queue to clean
>>    * @budget: Total limit on number of packets to process
>>    *
>> - * Returns true if there's any budget left (e.g. the clean is finished)
>> + * Returns number of packets cleaned from this queue
> 
> Hi Alok,
> 
> Perhaps while this line is being updated it could
> also be changed to use "Return:" or "Returns:".
> 
> Flagged by ./scripts/kernel-doc -none -Wall
> 
>>    */
>>   static int idpf_rx_singleq_clean(struct idpf_rx_queue *rx_q, int budget)
>>   {
>> -- 
>> 2.50.1
>>

Thanks Simon,

It seems that this file, and almost the entire driver uses "Returns" 
rather than "Returns:". In this case, it might be better to keep it 
consistent with the existing style. or
Should we just update this file to use “Returns:” for consistency, or 
would it be better to update the entire driver for consistency instead?

Thanks,
Alok

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ