netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] net: phy: add phy_may

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a6882bfa-866e-4079-b38a-ca2ed30609b9@broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:31:24 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
 Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
 Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/6] net: phy: add phy_may_wakeup()

On 10/22/25 11:20, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2025 at 03:43:20PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> That's not exactly what's happening, this suggest this is merely a
>> wrapper around device_may_wakeup().
>>
>> I don't think it's worth blocking the series though, but if you need to
>> respin maybe this could be reworded.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
> 
> I've updated the description as I think patch 4 needs a repost:
> 
> +/**
> + * phy_may_wakeup() - indicate whether PHY has wakeup enabled
> + * @phydev: The phy_device struct
> + *
> + * Returns: true/false depending on the PHY driver's device_set_wakeup_enabled()
> + * setting if using the driver model, otherwise the legacy determination.
> + */
> +bool phy_may_wakeup(struct phy_device *phydev);
> +
> 
> Do you want me to still add your r-b?

Yes, I saw that comment, should have mentioned this applied to your 
revision. Thanks!
-- 
Florian