netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] net: ravb: Allocate correct number of queues based on SoC support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8un_DQdQcg+kQUs_HCRK15H-K3dW_yBtWXWzH9RMARJ_Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:52:33 +0100
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@...natech.se>, 
	Paul Barker <paul@...rker.dev>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, 
	Mitsuhiro Kimura <mitsuhiro.kimura.kc@...esas.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org, 
	Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] net: ravb: Allocate correct number of queues based
 on SoC support

Hi Jakub,

Thank you for the review.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 2:13 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:18:28 +0100 Prabhakar wrote:
> > On SoCs that only support the best-effort queue and not the network
> > control queue, calling alloc_etherdev_mqs() with fixed values for
> > TX/RX queues is not appropriate. Use the nc_queues flag from the
> > per-SoC match data to determine whether the network control queue
> > is available, and fall back to a single TX/RX queue when it is not.
> > This ensures correct queue allocation across all supported SoCs.
>
> Same comment as on patch 1, what is the _real_ problem?
> Allocating a bit too much memory is not an stable-worthy issue.

Ok, I will drop the fixes tag and cc to stable and post it for net-next.

Cheers,
Prabhakar