[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+Wv_tzq7LR64bN=x76=HBBmtR+GG5nDEi4fX8zokj71A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 05:30:51 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net-next 5/5] neighbour: Convert rwlock of struct
neigh_table to spinlock.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 10:40 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Only neigh_for_each() and neigh_seq_start/stop() are on the
> reader side of neigh_table.lock.
>
> Let's convert rwlock to the plain spinlock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...gle.com>
>
Do we still need _bh prefix ?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists