[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251023192842.31a2efc0@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 19:28:42 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
razor@...ckwall.org, pabeni@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com,
sdf@...ichev.me, john.fastabend@...il.com, martin.lau@...nel.org,
jordan@...fe.io, maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
dw@...idwei.uk, toke@...hat.com, yangzhenze@...edance.com,
wangdongdong.6@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 02/15] net: Implement
netdev_nl_bind_queue_doit
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:23:42 +0200 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> +void netdev_rx_queue_peer(struct net_device *src_dev,
> + struct netdev_rx_queue *src_rxq,
> + struct netdev_rx_queue *dst_rxq)
> +{
> + netdev_assert_locked(src_dev);
> + netdev_assert_locked(dst_rxq->dev);
> +
> + netdev_hold(src_dev, &src_rxq->dev_tracker, GFP_KERNEL);
Isn't ->dev_tracker already used by sysfs?
Are you handling the underlying device going away?
> + __netdev_rx_queue_peer(src_rxq, dst_rxq);
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists