[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQHBKitU6Gyjk37e@debianbuilder>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:24:26 +0100
From: Buday Csaba <buday.csaba@...lan.hu>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: mdio: reset PHY before attempting
to access registers in fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy
On Tue, Oct 28, 2025 at 06:26:05PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Oct 2025 11:08:53 +0200 Buday Csaba wrote:
> > +/* Hard-reset a PHY before registration */
> > +static int fwnode_reset_phy(struct mii_bus *bus, u32 addr,
> > + struct fwnode_handle *phy_node)
> > +{
> > + struct mdio_device *tmpdev;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + tmpdev = mdio_device_create(bus, addr);
> > + if (IS_ERR(tmpdev))
> > + return PTR_ERR(tmpdev);
> > +
> > + fwnode_handle_get(phy_node);
> > + device_set_node(&tmpdev->dev, phy_node);
> > + err = mdio_device_register_reset(tmpdev);
> > + if (err) {
> > + mdio_device_free(tmpdev);
> > + return err;
>
> Should we worry about -EPROBE_DEFER on any of the error paths here?
> If not maybe consider making this function void? We can add errors
> back if the caller starts to care.
That is a very valid point, thanks! I think I can handle that correctly,
by propagating that (or any other) error codes to the caller of
fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy(). fwnode_reset_phy() does nothing that
would not be expected to occur during the normal registration, so if
it fails here, it would fail later as well.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (mdio_device_has_reset(tmpdev)) {
> > + dev_info(&bus->dev,
> > + "PHY device at address %d not detected, resetting PHY.",
> > + addr);
>
> IDK if this is still strictly necessary but I guess \n at the end of
> the info msg would be idiomatic
>
I will separate the error message to another patch, then the maintainers
can decide wheter to merge it or not.
Thanks for the feedback!
I should be able to send v5 soon.
Csaba
Powered by blists - more mailing lists