[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aQNXTscqFcucETEW@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 12:17:18 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>,
Mohd Ayaan Anwar <mohd.anwar@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: qcom-ethqos: remove MAC_CTRL_REG
modification
Konrad, Ayaan,
Can you shed any light on the manipulation of the RGMII_IO_MACRO_CONFIG
and RGMII_IO_MACRO_CONFIG2 registers in ethqos_configure_sgmii()?
Specifically:
- why would RGMII_CONFIG2_RGMII_CLK_SEL_CFG be set for 2.5G and 1G
speeds, but never be cleared for any other speed?
- why is RGMII_CONFIG_SGMII_CLK_DVDR set to SGMII_10M_RX_CLK_DVDR
for 10M, but never set to any other value for other speeds?
To me, this code looks very suspicious.
If you have time, please test with a connection capable of 1000BASE-T,
100BASE-TX and 10BASE-T, modifying the advertisement to make it
negotiate each of these, and checking that packet transfer is still
possible.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists